Psychometric Validation of the Flourishing Scale among LGBT Population
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24016/2026.v12.501Keywords:
flourishing, LGBT, psychometric validation, measurement invariance, well-beingAbstract
Introduction: Flourishing is a key indicator of positive mental health and psychosocial functioning. However, evidence on the measurement performance of the Flourishing Scale (FS) in sexual and gender minority (LGBT/SGM) populations in the Spanish-speaking Caribbean remains limited.
Objective: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the FS among LGBT adults in Puerto Rico.
Method: Participants were recruited online (N = 300). Given item-level and multivariate non-normality, a robust one-factor CFA was estimated and examined global fit, standardized loadings, and reliability (α, ω). Evidence for validity included (a) Average Variance Extracted (AVE) as an indicator-level convergence index and (b) associations with external criteria (PHQ-8, GAD-7). Multi-group CFA tested configural, metric, and scalar invariance across gender identity and sexual orientation.
Results: The robust CFA supported a unidimensional structure with strong standardized loadings and high internal consistency. AVE exceeded .50, indicating adequate indicator-level convergence within the measurement model. As hypothesized, FS scores correlated negatively with PHQ-8 and GAD-7. Multi-group CFA supported metric and scalar invariance by gender identity and scalar invariance by sexual orientation, with borderline evidence at the metric step, enabling latent-mean comparisons under supported conditions.
Conclusions: The FS is a brief, reliable, and valid indicator of psychological flourishing among LGBT adults in Puerto Rico, suitable for research, screening, and program evaluation; however, convergent validity with an independent positive well-being measure should be established in future work.
Downloads
References
Arifin, W. N. (2025a). Sample size calculator (web). Retrieved from http://wnarifin.github.io
Arifin, W. N. (2025b). A web-based sample size calculator for structural equation modelling. Education in Medicine Journal, 17(1), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2025.17.1.14
Ato, M., López, J. J., & Benavente, A. (2013). Un sistema de clasificación de Ios diseños de investigación en psicología [A classification system for research designs in psychology]. Anales de Psicología, 29(3), 1038–1059. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.3.178511
Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Psychology Press.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046016
Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464-504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957
De la Fuente, R., Parra, A., & Sánchez-Queija, I. (2017). Psychometric Properties of the Flourishing Scale and Measurement Invariance Between Two Samples of Spanish University Students. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 40(4), 409–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278717703446
DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th Ed). Sage Publications.
Didino, D., Taran, E., Barysheva, G., & Casati, F. (2019). Psychometric evaluation of the Russian version of the flourishing scale in a sample of older adults living in Siberia. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 17, 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1100-6
Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D.-W., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y
Doornik, J. A., & Hansen, H. (2008). An omnibus test for univariate and multivariate normality. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 70(1), 927–939. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00537.x
Espejo, B., Martín-Carbonell, M., & Checa, I. (2022). Psychometric properties and measurement invariance by gender of the abbreviated three-item version of the Satisfaction with Life Scale in a Colombian sample. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(5), 2595. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19052595
Expósito-Campos, P., Pérez, J. I., & Salaberria, K. (2022). Empirically supported affirmative psychological interventions for transgender and non-binary youth and adults: A systematic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 95, 102229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102229
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
González-Rivera, J. A. (2018). Propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Florecimiento en Puerto Rico [Psychometric Properties of the Flourishing Scale in Puerto Rico]. Revista Evaluar, 18(3), 30-43. https://doi.org/10.35670/1667-4545.v18.n3.22203
González-Rivera, J. A. (2019). Flourishing Scale in the atheist community of Puerto Rico: Validation and psychometric study. Ciencias de la Conducta, 34(1), 215–230. http://cienciasdelaconducta.org/index.php/cdc/article/view/19
González-Rivera, J. A. (2019). Validation and dimensionality of Patient Health Questionnaire for Depression (PHQ-8 and PHQ-9) in Hispanic LGBT Community. International Journal of Recent Scientific Research, 10(12), 36670-36676.
Hatzenbuehler, M. L. (2016). Structural stigma and health inequalities: Research evidence and implications for psychological science. American Psychologist, 71(8), 742–751. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000068
Hatzenbuehler, M. L., Phelan, J. C., & Link, B. G. (2013). Stigma as a fundamental cause of population health inequalities. American Journal of Public Health, 103(5), 813–821. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.301069
Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Peng, K., & Greenholtz, J. (2002). What’s wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective Likert scales? The reference-group effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 903–918. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.903
Kittiteerasack, P., Matthews, A., & Park, C. (2021). Psychometric properties of the Thai version of the Internalized Sexual Stigma scale for research on lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) populations. Journal of Homosexuality, 68(13), 2348–2367. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2021.2000013
Kroenke, K., Strine, T. W., Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B. W., Berry, J. T., & Mokdad, A. H. (2009). The PHQ-8 as a measure of current depression in the general population. Journal of Affective Disorders, 114(1–3), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2008.06.026
Landa-Blanco, M., Cortés-Ramos, A., Vásquez, G., Reyes, Y., & Echenique, Y. (2023). Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Flourishing Scale in the Honduran population. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1223269. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1223269
Mansouri, M. (2025). Psychometric validation and measurement invariance of the Flourishing Scale (FS) in the Algerian context. Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences, 7, e15497. https://doi.org/10.5964/miss.15497
Martín-Carbonell, M., Espejo, B., Checa, I., & Fernández-Daza, M. (2021). Adaptation and measurement invariance by gender of the Flourishing Scale in a Colombian sample. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(5), 2664. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052664
Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58(4), 525–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294825
Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 674–697. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674
Pagán-Torres, O. M., González-Rivera, J. A., & Rosario-Hernández, E. (2020b). Psychometric Analysis and Factor Structure of the Spanish Version of the Eight-Item Patient Health Questionnaire in a General Sample of Puerto Rican Adults. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 42(3), 401-415. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986320926524
Pagán-Torres, O., González-Rivera, J. A., & Rosario-Hernández, E. (2020a). Reviewing the psychometric properties and factor structure of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) in a sample of Puerto Rican adults. International Journal of Recent Scientific Research, 11(1), 36885-36888.
Pozo-Muñoz, C., Garzón-Umerenkova, A., Bretones-Nieto, B., & Ligia-Charry, C. (2016). Psychometric properties and dimensionality of the “Flourishing Scale” in Spanish-speaking population. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 14(1), 175-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.14204/ejrep.38.15044
Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004
Sabah, A., Aljaberi, M., El-Mir, M., Hajji, J., & Alduais, A. (2025). Psychometric properties of the Arabic Flourishing Scale. Qualitative Health Research, 35(2), 321–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315251315942
Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66(4), 507-514. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296192
Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B. W., & Löwe, B. (2006). A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: The GAD-7. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166(10), 1092–1097. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092
Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002
Wolf, E. J., Harrington, K. M., Clark, S. L., & Miller, M. W. (2013). Sample size requirements for structural equation models: An evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(6), 913–934. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413495237
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Interacciones
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain the copyright and give the journal the right of the first publication and that they can edit it, reproduce it, distribute it, exhibit it and communicate it in the country and abroad through printed and digital media.
The digital version of the journal is registered under a Creative Commons license (Under Creative Commons License): Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). Therefore, this work can be reproduced, distributed and publicly communicated in digital format, provided that the names of the authors and Interacciones.
Therefore, it is established that authors can make other independent and additional behavioural agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (eg, include it in institutional repositories or publish it in a book) as long as it is clearly indicated that the work was published for the first time in this journal.
